Skip to main content

SCOREBOARD

Fiala deal leaves Kings vulnerable to dual offer sheet strategy

Kevin Fiala Jacob Markstrom Chris Tanev Minnesota Wild Calgary Flames Kevin Fiala Jacob Markstrom Chris Tanev - The Canadian Press
Published

The Los Angeles Kings adding star winger Kevin Fiala in a deal with the Minnesota Wild last week certainly shuffled the deck in the Western Conference. A pesky playoff team last season, the Kings addressed a core need – scoring firepower – for a prospect and a first-round pick in the upcoming draft.

Any time there’s an opportunity to add a player fresh off a 33-goal and 85-point season, you must consider the deal. But there is an opportunity cost here. By way of the trade, the Kings also added a $55.1 million liability to their balance sheet, one that will hit their cap to the tune of $7.9 million each year.

That’s particularly notable considering the NHL’s current economic landscape. With the salary cap at $82.5-million, the Kings – who have just 36 rostered players and just under $12 million in remaining cap space – have a limited amount of money remaining for an awful lot of roster spots to fill. Of particular note: The Kings have seven restricted free agents to take care of this off-season.

This is where an opportunistic rival team can take advantage of Los Angeles’ bet on Fiala. Amongst those seven restricted free agents are several valuable players who would normally command a pretty penny in an unrestricted market. The Kings likely hope to reach bridge deals with a number of these players for the next couple of seasons, while trying to secure 35-goal scorer Adrian Kempe at most any cost.

But there are a lot of other names who played consequential minutes for this team a season ago, and that’s across both position groups:

And so, it’s once again time to discuss the dual offer sheet strategy.

For years now, we have talked about tendering dual offer sheets to cap-distressed or cash-poor teams to force another club into a decision they don’t want to make.

I’ve argued for years that the value of offer sheets are largely misunderstood; top-tier restricted free agents are too expensive when it comes to offer sheet compensation, and lower-end restricted free agents aren’t worth the hassle.

There was a time where offer sheets were non-existent in the league, but the Carolina Hurricanes ended that streak last season.

Consider this year’s restricted free agent compensation table, with particular attention to the middle range:

For a team with all three available picks (a first, a second, and a third), a franchise can send simultaneous offer sheets – in this case towards Los Angeles – to land a coveted young player.

There are many situations where this strategy doesn’t make sense, but for a cap-distressed team with multiple quality young players it is hoping to keep at a fractional cost, it can be deadly.

This is where a team should be predatory with the Kings. Every team in the league would benefit from adding Kempe its roster. Los Angeles knows this, but any attempt to keep Kempe on a larger deal means there will be a squeeze across the rest of the roster.

A player like Gabriel Vilardi – a former first-round pick in his own right – could naturally draw attention. Rookie surprise Sean Durzi could as well. But it’s Mikey Anderson, Drew Doughty’s defensive partner from a season ago, who looks like the big prize behind Kempe.

Consider Anderson’s 2021-22 season. If we look at Anderson’s contributions (we will use Goals Above Replacement for an apples-to-apples comparison across the league), we can get a feel for similarly productive players:

That’s an impressive sophomore season for a 23-year-old defenceman. It’s also one that’s probably worth betting on for a team looking to fill a hole on a blueline. So, what would a dual offer sheet look like to potentially paralyze Los Angeles here?

- Tender an offer sheet to forward Kempe at $6.3mm AAV at the cost of a first-round pick and a third-round pick.

- Tender an offer sheet to defenceman Anderson at $4.2mm AAV at the cost of a second-round pick.

If Los Angeles chooses to sign both players on these deals, they will be left with just $1.4-million in cap space to manage the rest of the roster. That’s not a crisis, but it’s not comfortable either and it would certainly require a series of moves the team may not want to make to become cap compliant.

Such a move requires a team to have all its picks, and of course, the cap space. But in a hard cap league, tough decisions are sometimes required. And perhaps the cost of adding Fiala is losing a player the calibre of Kempe or, more realistically, Anderson.

To the aggressor go the spoils!

Data via Hockey Reference, Cap Friendly, Evolving Hockey, Natural Stat Trick